Did I get your attention with ‘inexpensive’?… read on to learn why else you might want to build a new VHF or AIS antenna.
You likely already have one antenna, which you use with your regular VHF radio. You may have considered getting a second antenna for use as a backup or with an AIS system. This article describes how to construct your own VHF antenna, using about $10 in parts plus a few hours of labour, and gives some straightforward mounting ideas.
Advantages of Separate Antennas
The advantages of having a backup are obvious (a frigate bird removed our masthead antenna at Tabuaeran), but it may be less obvious why separate antennas for VHF voice and AIS are useful. After all, one can buy antenna splitters for sharing a single antenna between your VHF radio and your AIS unit. Some AIS units even include a built-in splitter. However, a separate antenna gives you:
- Redundancy: If you lose your primary antenna, you can connect your second antenna to your VHF and continue talking.
- Simplicity: You only need point-to-point connections (no splicing-in or teeing-off), which is simpler to troubleshoot, and there is no requirement to co-locate the VHF radio and the AIS unit. With fewer failure points, it is less likely that a single fault will disable both your VHF radio and your AIS.
- Higher performance: Separate antennas eliminate a transmit-isolating switch, reduce the number of connections, and minimize the coax length between the antenna and device, all of which retain stronger signals for both your radio and AIS. Finally, with separate antennas you can receive AIS data from other ships while transmitting on your VHF (though you are unlikely to notice this unless you spend a lot of time talking on the radio).
So let’s assume you are convinced to get a second VHF/AIS antenna. You can purchase a traditional whip antenna, such as the Shakespeare model 5215 ($85), or you can build your own, following the instructions in this article and it will perform as well as a commercial product. Let’s start with a sprinkling of radio theory to explain the design. You can skip this part if you want, and just hop down to the construction portion. I have included some definitions at the end of this article to help with terminology.
Antenna Theory and Design
These are the principles upon which an antenna functions:
- a changing current in a conductor generates an electromagnetic field (we call this transmission)
- a changing electromagnetic field generates a current in a conductor (reception)
So, an antenna is really just a conductor, like a wire, which changes electrical current into an electromagnetic field, and vice versa. When used for communication, we call these electromagnetic fields radio waves.
Antennas are most efficient at sending out and capturing radio waves when the antenna’s length is matched to specific fractions of the radio wave’s length. For marine VHF (frequencies between 156 MHz to 163 MHz), a formula tells us the wavelength is about 1.91 metres.
Many antenna designs exist, each emphasizing some important characteristic such as gain, directivity, polarization, bandwidth, and physical size. A common VHF masthead antenna (such as the Shakespeare mentioned earlier) has a half-wavelength vertical element, which is about 1.91 m / 2 = 96 cm = 38 inches long. In practice, it will be slightly shorter due to physical properties of the antenna’s conductor. Another commonly seen VHF antenna is about 8 feet long and usually mounted on the stern rail; it has more gain than the shorter masthead antenna but is also more directional (i.e. one loses signal strength when heeled over).
The antenna we’ll be building will be a half-wave dipole, featuring simple construction, good balance between gain and directionality, and easy mounting.
Antenna Construction
The photo of the finished antenna shows it looks like a ‘T’, with the leg of the T comprised of a short length of coax, and the arms of the T comprised of a longer length of rope.
Inside the rope’s hollow core are threaded two lengths of wire. Constructing it is straightforward:
- you measure and cut a length of coax;
- strip the outer insulation from the coax to a measured distance;
- solder a wire in place of the coax braid;
- thread the antenna into the rope;
- and finally attach a connector.
Materials Needed
For materials, you will need:
- Approximately 2m of coax, depending on where you mount the antenna. 50-ohm coax types such as RG-58 or CA-195R are suitable and have an easy-to-work-with diameter. Avoid 75-ohm coax, such as used for cable TV applications.
- Approximately 45cm of insulated stranded wire. Tinned copper is preferred. The gauge is not critical: 14 AWG to 18 AWG is easy to handle and has sufficient physical strength.
- A connector for attaching to the longer coax running to your radio / AIS. I suggest a BNC connector or a PL-259: both are available for common coax diameters. Order several extras that you can practice with, if this is the first time you are using a particular model of connector.
- Approximately 2m of hollow-core rope for mounting. It should be large enough diameter that the antenna can be threaded through, but small enough to reduce windage; we used a 12mm diameter scrap of double-braid line with the core pulled out.
- Soldering iron and solder
- Self-amalgamating tape
- 3M4200, Sikaflex, or similar caulking for waterproofing soldered joints
Let’s Start
First decide on where you want to install the antenna (see the following Mounting section for some ideas). This affects how long you make the antenna’s coax tail. You can make it long enough to reach your radio or AIS unit in one unbroken piece, but this might make installation difficult. Instead, I recommend a shorter tail that attaches to a longer run of coax inside the mast. Our antenna has a 1 metre tail, ending in a BNC connector. This connector attaches near the foredeck light to the coax inside our mast. If you aren’t quite decided on where to mount it yet, you can cut the coax longer than you’ll need, and trim it later when you put the connector on.
Now we’ll construct the antenna from one end of the coax, before inserting it into the rope. Here is the procedure, with photos corresponding to the numbered steps:
- Cut a piece of coax 50 cm (+/- 1 cm) longer than the length of tail you want.
- Strip approx 45 cm (+/- 1 cm) of outer jacket off the coax. Start a lengthwise slit in the jacket with a sharp blade. Then while holding the braid + core in one hand, with the other hand pull the jacket sideways. The jacket should split away from the core – if not, use the blade to make a lengthwise score in the outside of the jacket before continuing to pull. Do not worry if the blade cuts a few strands of the coax braid: you will be replacing the braid with an insulated wire later.
- Separate the braid from the core. One way to do this is to bunch up the braid so the strands open up, revealing the core beneath. A small screwdriver can then be used to fish the core out.
- Some coax types (e.g. CA-195R) include a foil shield wrapped around the centre conductor. If so, unwrap and remove the foil shield.
- Cut most of the braid off and discard it, leaving a length of about 2 cm for soldering to
- Solder 45 cm (+/- 1 cm) of insulated stranded wire to the protruding braid
- Straighten out the coax core and insulated wire and lay them parallel to a measuring tape. Measuring from the end of the coax jacket, trim both the core and insulated wire to a length of 40.5 cm (+/- 0.2 cm). This is the step that sets the resonant frequency of your antenna to that used by AIS. To optimize the antenna for VHF channel 16 instead, trim the wires to 43.0 cm. If you want a dual-purpose antenna, don’t worry, either length will work satisfactorily.
Here’s the fun part where the two legs of the antenna are fed into the rope, leaving the tail protruding from the midpoint. Pretty much any length of rope with a hollow core will do, provided the antenna legs fit inside, and there’s enough rope left over for tying the antenna straight between two mounting points. I’ll describe one way of doing this – I’m sure you can imagine other methods.
- Locate the midpoint of the rope. Spread the outer braid to expose the core and pull it partway out.
- Cut the core midway along the protruding loop, and tape each antenna tail to a core end. Box tape or sheathing tape work well.
- Pull and milk the cores out the ends of the rope, such that they pull the antenna legs into the centre of the rope. Continue pulling until the coax tail of the antenna butts up to the midpoint of the rope.
- Seal the coax where it enters the rope using 3M4200 or similar caulking. The goal is to prevent water from wicking up into the coax and into the insulated wire, so ensure the spots where bare conductors exit insulation are well saturated with sealant. Applying additional sealant to the rope in the immediate area of the T-junction won’t hurt. Before the sealant hardens, pull both the rope and antenna legs taught so a smooth junction is formed. Suspend the rope under moderate tension while the sealant cures.
- Now the rope cores can be detached from the wire antenna legs, and discarded. Seal the ends of the wires with sealant to prevent water from wicking in. Let the sealant cure then push the ends back into the hollow centre of the rope.
-
- Finally, attach a connector to the antenna tail. The actual steps will depend on the type of connector chosen, so follow the manufacturer’s recommendations. PL-259 connectors are available in crimp or solder versions, and are low-cost. BNC connectors are smaller, but a bit more complicated to assemble. If this is your first time assembling either type of connector, I suggest practicing using a scrap piece of coax, instead of risking spoiling your nice antenna. Once you are confident of the results, then proceed to install the connector on your antenna.
That’s it! Your antenna is finished – pat yourself on the back!
Testing Finished Antenna
Before going to the effort of mounting your new antenna, spend a few moments testing it. The first test is to use an ohm meter to measure resistance between the two contacts of the connector: it should read as an open circuit. If not, there is most likely a short in the connector, or possibly between the coax braid and centre conductor at the T-junction.
The second test is to connect the antenna to a VHF radio or AIS system and check whether you get reception. Once this works, the final test is to try transmitting, but keep people and sensitive electronics several metres away to reduce RF exposure.
Mounting and Connecting
When mounting your antenna, keep in mind these considerations: higher up gives better range; avoiding proximity to other antennas reduces interference; and a shorter coax run to your radio retains more of the wanted signals. You should also keep the antenna legs approximately vertical and spaced away from metal objects, to keep the performance omni-directional in the horizontal plane. Incorporating your antenna inside the rope makes it easy to tie between two mounting points. We mounted ours between a spreader and a shroud, as shown here.
The connection between the antenna tail and the coax running back to your radio should be waterproofed. Wrapping a few layers of self-amalgamating tape around the connectors will do the trick.
Antenna Performance
How does this antenna perform? Quite well, as measured both with an antenna analyser and in real-world results.
An antenna analyser (Array Solutions AIM-4170D) measures the resonant frequency of this antenna as 162.02 MHz, which nicely corresponds with the frequencies used by AIS (161.975 MHz and 162.025 MHz). Additional results are shown in this table:
To put these figures into perspective, a 50-foot length of RG-58 cable has about 50% power loss. So, we expect this homemade antenna to perform slightly better than the commercial one for AIS use, and slightly less well at VHF channel 16, but the differences will likely be obscured by losses in the cables leading to the antennas.
For those who are interested, here is the analyser’s plot for our antenna between 130 MHz and 180 MHz.
In real-world use, our homemade antenna works great at picking up AIS signals when attached to an SR-161 AIS receiver. Here’s a screenshot from our chartplotter, while we were near Bahía Concepción in the Sea of Cortez, showing AIS targets up and down the Baja coast. Note the two targets south of Puerto Vallarta, over 500 nautical miles away! But wait, you say, VHF is supposed to be line-of-sight… This long-distance reception demonstrates the phenomenon of atmospheric ducting, an interesting topic in itself. Our antenna can’t claim all the credit, but certainly works well at nearer targets too.
Definitions and Sources
- Automated Identification System (AIS): A vessel safety system in which periodic broadcasts from equipped vessels (and aids to navigation) of their position, speed, heading, etc, can be received by other vessels. AIS uses two frequencies in the marine VHF band, 161.975 MHz (AIS1) and 162.025 MHz (AIS2).
- Electromagnetic (EM) wave: An oscillating electric and magnetic field that travels through space at the speed of light (which is also an EM wave). The frequency of oscillation determines whether we call it a Radio wave, Light, Infrared radiation, etc.
- Current: A flow of electrons in a conductor. Under the right conditions, this flow results in EM waves and the conductor is then acting like an antenna.
- Coaxial cable: Often abbreviated to coax. Cable consisting of two conductors: a centre wire surrounded by an outer shield. The shield may be comprised of braided strands, or foil, or both. Coax is useful in carrying RF signals because it does not emit much electromagnetic energy.
- Impedance: A measure of the ratio of voltage to current in a conductor. Coax cables used for RF commonly have a 50 ohm impedance. Ideally, any loads attached to a coax cable should have the same impedance, otherwise losses increase.
- Radio Frequency (RF): A frequency in the range used for communications. Generally considered to be from a few kHz to 300 GHz. The RF spectrum is sub-divided into bands with names such as HF, VHF, and UHF.
- Standing Wave Ratio (SWR): The ratio of the highest amplitude voltages to the lowest amplitude voltages along a transmission line. It indicates how well the impedance of a load (e.g. antenna) is matched to the impedance of the transmission line (e.g. coax). A ratio of 1:1 means that the match is exact. Higher ratios result in more reflections and less signal at the load.
- Very High Frequency (VHF): The band of frequencies from 30 MHz to 300 MHz. Marine VHF spans 156 MHz to 163 MHz.
Resources
- Coax cable and connectors can be ordered from RadioWorld in Toronto. Their PL-259 silver-plated connector, part #CON-100S, costs $6. A reducer for RG-58 (fits CA-195R too), part #CON-108, costs $1. They ship quickly and at a reasonable fee.
- CA-195R is sometimes harder to find than RG-58. L-Com usually has it in stock ($0.58US / foot) and will ship to Canadian addresses for about $17US. They also have a good selection of connectors.
- Plenty of videos and articles on assembling connectors are on the internet. You will sometimes find conflicting advice – when in doubt, check whether the cable or connector manufacturer has any specific instructions. Amphenol (a connector manufacturer) has this clear document.
- Another set of very detailed instructions for PL-259 connectors can be found here.
I hope this article has been useful and inspires you to have fun making and playing with antennas. If you have any questions or comments, I’ll be happy to hear from you!
Thx Bjarne and Barb.
I will be building one when we get back to Passat II in
April.
Wishing you fair winds and calm anchorages.
Barrie and Sandra
Hi Barb and Bjarne,
I had remembered this article from last year, and when our old VHF antenna proved to be unsuitable for AIS (VWSR of ~8:1), it was a perfect time to try it out. Since our antenna is mounted on the stern arch, I decided that I will mount the wires inside a PVC tube or similar. For now, it is working with the wires just taped to the old fiberglass antenna.
Shawn & Janis
S/V Callisto
Shawn & Janis: Glad to hear you are giving this project a try! Thanks for mentioning your idea of inserting the antenna in a plastic tube – that sounds like a good alternative to using the hollow-braided rope, and will allow more mounting options. There might be some interaction between your old antenna and your new one, when it is taped to the fiberglass shaft: it’s possible that the radiation pattern might become more directional. Won’t hurt to try it though!
For other readers: One thing to keep in mind when installing the antenna is that the centre coax (the piece from which the two legs of the antenna project) should be approximately perpendicular to the legs. If the coax runs too close or parallel to one of the legs, then antenna performance can suffer. So, if mounting the antenna inside a tube, only the legs should be inside the tube, while the coax feedline should exit the tube at the middle. One possible way of doing this (which you may already have thought of), is constructing the tube from two sections of PVC pipe with a ‘Tee’ in the middle where the feedline comes out.
One last thought… If you have access to an SWR meter like Shawn, then you can use it to check the construction & installation of your antenna. A VSWR of 2:1 or better is a good target. You can even fine-tune your antenna to optimize it for a particular VHF frequency, by cutting the legs several cm longer during construction, and then trimming both legs a few mm at a time until the SWR stops improving.
Bjarne
s/v Hoku Pa’a
Hello, I have built the antenna and the results have not been as expected.
I have seen that according to the formula for the 162MHz frequency the length should be 46cm and not 40.5 and also the antenna does not transmit, or I do not hear anything on another station
Do you think your data is wrong and this is the problem?
Regards, and thanks for your work
Edu
Hi Edu,
I’m sorry to hear there are difficulties getting your antenna working.
You are correct that the formula (length = c / frequency) gives a length of about 46 cm at marine VHF and AIS frequencies. However, this is when we use the speed of light in a vacuum (c = 300 000 km/s). In a conductor, such as a coax cable, the speed of electromagnetic waves is slower. Thus the EM wave will have a shorter length than when it is traveling through air or vacuum. A more accurate estimate of the needed coax length would be length = c * p / frequency, where p is the propagation coefficient for the cable being used (i.e. the percentage of the speed of light that EM waves travel in the cable). Manufacturers often publish this coefficient for their cables, and it usually ranges from about 50% to 95%.
The practical consequence is that an optimum antenna length will be less than about 46 cm, and I found that 40.5cm worked well for the cable I used. One way of finding the optimum is to initially size the antenna longer than needed (e.g. start with 46 cm), and then trim it gradually while testing its performance. It’s reception and transmission should improve until reaching a peak at the best length, after which further trimming will start decreasing performance. If one doesn’t have an antenna analyser, then a subjective performance check could be to record what the farthest distance that AIS targets are received reliably at, over a period of time that gives a good sampling of various transmitting boats.
In your particular case, it sounds like the antenna length is *not* the main problem. If you are not receiving any stations at all, and are not able to transmit to another VHF radio, then it sounds like there is another problem. Even if the length varies from the ideal by 15%, an antenna should still function reasonably well.
I would suggest first checking the assembly of the connector for unintentional shorts between the centre conductor and the shield. Use an ohmmeter to measure the resistance at the connector: between the centre pin and the outer shell. It should read infinite; if there is a low resistance, then possibly a strand of the coax braid is shorting to the centre conductor somewhere (at the connector, or possibly at the ‘T’ junction where the braid separates from the centre).
The next measurement you could try is to check the resistance between the connector centre pin, and the tip of the antenna that corresponds to the centre conductor. This reading should be low (< 2 ohms). Likewise, the resistance between the connector's shell and the tip of the antenna that corresponds to the coax braid, should also be very low. If either of these is higher than expected, then it is likely that the connection of the coax to the connector is faulty.
If these checks all pass, then the next thing I would suspect is the radio or AIS receiver. If you have a substitute antenna, you could try it with the same radio / AIS unit. Alternatively, you can try your built antenna with a different radio or AIS receiver that is known to be working.
I hope this helps you locate the problem. Let me know how it goes!
Cheers, Bjarne
Hi Bjarne, thank you very much for your lesson, very useful.
Next week I’ll have time to work on it and I’ll share the results with you.
Fair winds…
Edu.
Hello Bjarne, I have done some tests and everything has improved, the antenna transmits. But in Ais I have only seen ships 8 miles away.
Tell me if it is correct: I have not cut the cable and I have made the antenna at the end of a 15 meter cable that I will then pass through the mast.
(I test it by raising it with a halyard)
The resistance is around 4.5 ohms (15m)
Should I put a connector to separate the antenna from the cable?
My Ais with the normal antenna at the top sees more boats and further away.
Saturday I will return
Thanks again for your help
Hi Edu,
Glad that you are now getting some results. Let’s see if we can further improve the performance…
Comparing the new antenna with the one at the top of your mast is a good approach. When you do the comparison, are the antennas at the same height? (i.e. are you hoisting the new antenna to the top of the mast as well?) Also note that all antennas are affected by nearby conductive materials, so try to keep several feet of separation between the antenna and metal objects (i.e. don’t have the legs (particularly the one connected to the centre coax conductor) of the antenna lying up against a metal mast). Related to that factor (nearby conductors), another consideration is the relative angle between the coax feedline, and the two legs of the antenna. Ideally, the feedline should be at right-angles to both legs of the antenna, and the legs should be in a straight vertical line (i.e. the three parts should form a ‘T’ shape). You can deviate a bit from this geometry, but definitely don’t have the legs parallel and close to the coax feedline.
If you have confirmed that the antennas are at a similar height, and equally unobstructed by nearby metal. then any performance difference will have to be in either the coax cable, or the antenna construction. Is the coax coming from your masthead antenna the same type as your new antenna? If they are the same then perhaps it is the lengths of the legs that need to be tuned. It’s difficult to temporarily shorten or lengthen them – but you could try simulating a shorter leg by folding back the tips and taping them in place. Try maybe changing them 1cm at a time, keeping both legs the same length. Compare the performance after each change and see whether that improves reception.
What type of coax did you select for the antenna? A DC resistance of 4.5 ohms sounds a bit high – I assume you are reporting the resistance from the connector to the tip of the leg. For example, the specs for one manufacturer’s CA-195R coax give a centre-conductor resistance of 8 ohms per 1000 feet, so a 15m run should only measure about 0.04 ohm (not including the connector, meter leads, etc). Perhaps you could double-check the solder or crimp connections in the connector, if you have attached one. If not, then is the coax damaged in any way (corrosion, bending fatigue, cuts)?
Putting a connector between the antenna and the main part of the feedline isn’t a bad thing to do, and might make installation easier, though if one can avoid adding another potential failure point that needs to be sealed against the elements, that would be better. However, before you go to the work of adding a connector it would be nice to sort out the performance questions…
Good luck, and keep me updated.
Hi Bjarne, I finally got to work and everything went well.
My multimeter had an error, the total resistance is 0.2 ohm and I think it is quite good.
The antenna has remained 44 cm with a
good result, just a little lower than the other at the top.
It is about 5 m below the top and is above the spreaders it has good range with Ais and good emission with voice.
Very happy with the result, and now I have made a dipole for FM at my house with very good results as well.
Thank you very much for your lesson
Fair winds..
Edu..